Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Jesus Loves Children
Taking a child, He set him before them, and taking him in His arms, He said to them, “Whoever receives one child like this in My name receives Me; and whoever receives Me does not receive Me, but Him who sent Me.” … Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe to stumble, it would be better for him if, with a heavy millstone hung around his neck, he had been cast into the sea. Mark 9:36-37,42.
And they were bringing children to Him so that He might touch them; but the disciples rebuked them. But when Jesus saw this, He was indignant and said to them, “Permit the children to come to Me; do not hinder them; for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. “Truly I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child will not enter it at all.” And He took them in His arms and began blessing them, laying His hands on them. Mark 10:13-16.
Where would Jesus stand on the issue of abortion?
This question again came to my mind as I read the article below this week.
I am convinced that the answer to this question is quite clear, as we read the text above.
Rising Above Roe v. Wade
Are babies better than abortions?
That's not a question we are accustomed to hearing. For the most part, abortion—America's most divisive issue—plays out as a question of competing rights. So it will be this weekend as pro-life and pro-choice legions each mark the 38th anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision on abortion.
Yet a simple figure released earlier this month by the Chiaroscuro Foundation, a private nonprofit organization, provokes a different question. After crunching the latest statistics from New York City's Health Department, the foundation reported that 41% of pregnancies (excluding miscarriage) in New York ended in abortion. That's double the national rate.
So again the question: As a society, does this figure say anything about the choice between a baby and abortion? Even for those who believe the choice for an abortion belongs to a woman alone and ought to be unfettered by city, state or federal law, is there any ratio such a person would say is too high?
The question becomes even more compelling when broken down by race. For Hispanics, the abortion rate was 41.3%—i.e., more than double the rate for whites. For African-Americans the numbers are still even grimmer: For every 1,000 African-American live births in New York, there were 1,489 abortions.
These numbers can make Roe seem very distant. Years ago, Bill Clinton famously summed up the pro-choice argument as "safe, legal, and rare." What can the qualifier "rare" mean, however, unless it means that in some fundamental sense, a baby is better than an abortion?
Some, of course, will argue that what they mean is that America ought to devote more resources to helping women prevent getting pregnant in the first place. Whether or not that's as easily done as said, a focus on not getting pregnant does nothing for the woman who is pregnant and finds herself with a hard choice.
So how is New York responding? Earlier this month, the Chiaroscuro Foundation put together a high-profile press conference that brought the archbishop of New York and the leader of the one of Orthodox Jewry's most distinguished organizations (Agudath Israel of America) together with the African-American pastor of a large, Harlem church and a Latina who serves as a spokeswoman for Democrats for Life. As the New York Sun pointed out, notwithstanding all this ecumenical focus on New York's distinction as America's abortion capital, it elicited nary a peep from the mayor.
Meanwhile, the speaker of the City Council, Christine Quinn, is pushing a bill designed to make it harder for people who are trying to help women keep their babies. Bill 371 targets Crisis Pregnancy Centers, and would require them, among other things, to advertise on site that they do not perform abortions or provide abortion referrals. It tells us something that there appears to be no interest in requiring that, say, Planned Parenthood post in their clinics some telling information of their own: 324,008 abortions nationwide against only 2,405 adoption referrals in 2008, the most recent year for which it reports statistics.
Rather than rehash the allegations against Crisis Pregnancy Centers—e.g., that they often disguise themselves as medical clinics, that they are not upfront about whether they offer abortion—let's stipulate for the sake of argument that they are all true. In the end, a woman who wants an abortion can still walk out and get one, as many do. A woman who doesn't necessarily want an abortion, however, can find all kinds of help: a place to live if her family or boyfriend has kicked her out; training for mother care; and, not least, the friendly face of a caring volunteer.
No doubt there are mothers who regret having their children. Occasionally you even read of one suing a doctor for not alerting her to a disability in her child that would have led her to abort if she had known. Far more common, however, are the websites with women repeating this heart-rending lament: "If only one person had encouraged me to keep my baby . . ."
On the moral claims and counterclaims on abortion, we have a vast chasm. Yet the moral divide can blind us to the possibilities that exist in all human communities. Might that start with recognizing that a 41% abortion rate means that many pregnant women are not getting the social help and encouragement they need to have their babies?
We all know people whose absolutism on a woman's legal right to choose does not prevent them from celebrating and supporting a pregnant woman within their midst who announces she is going to have a baby. So put aside Roe for a minute. And ask yourself this: What kind of America might we have if all pregnant women—especially black and Hispanic women who are disproportionately aborting—could feel from society that same welcome and encouragement?
Are babies better than abortions?
Would it be too much to say "babies are better"?
by WILLIAM MCGURN, WSJ, January 18, 2010
Of all of the mistakes America has committed, I am convinced abortion is our nation’s greatest sin. The arguments that led to Roe v Wade were contrived … safe, legal, and rare is actually legalese for legalized murder … and often. This is America’s disgrace, and I am convinced God will hold America accountable for the horrible end-results. Abortion is murder, regardless of the clever logic, and politically correct wording ... and the stories of coat hanger abortions, rape, and incest only lead to confuse the real issue ... MURDER. Certainly this logic is not justification for the infanticide of millions of babies in America over the past thirty eight years. This is a disgrace!
Planned Parenthood is making millions every year promoting and performing this evil act. This one issue alone was justification for Christians to no even consider voting for President Obama. What were good Christians thinking? I am convinced that this is where we end up when we follow the politically correct rhetoric. One foolish teaching leads to another; and then another; and the next thing you know … people who claim to love God are aborting and killing babies. And people who claim to love God are voting politicians into office who promote and encourage the expansion of abortion in America.
THIS IS A DISGRACE!!!
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. ...
A wise person chooses the right road; a fool takes the wrong one. Ecclesiastes 10:2.
I understand that our nation is consumed by the talk of the economy, the irresponsible spending, illegal immigration, and the wars with radical Islam ... but these issues are only diversions when compared to America’s Disgrace. This should be the primary number one issue in the next presidential election. Will this evil even be discussed? I think most likely not. Pray for our nation’s deliverance from this evil.
He who walks with wise men will be wise, But the companion of fools will suffer harm. Proverbs 13:20.
God Bless you my friends, Bob